Has political expediency stalled policy progress?

20 October 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Mike Taylor writes that the Turnbull Government’s determination to avoid a Royal Commission may have resulted in successive exercises in political expediency and the pursuit of ultimately poor policy.

As the Turnbull Government enters the 12-month period during which it is likely to call the next Federal Election it is worth reflecting upon its performance with respect to the financial services industry and, on the face of it, it has barely earned a pass mark.

An analysis of what the Government has achieved during this term in office reveals a mish-mash of policy initiatives, many of them aimed at what may ultimately prove to be the futile exercise of heading off Opposition calls for a Royal Commission into the Banking and Financial Services industry.

As the political opinion polls currently stand, a Federal Election would see the installation of a Federal Labor Government. Commensurate with the repeated promises made by Opposition leader, Bill Shorten and Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen, we would then quickly be witness to the Royal Commission the Turnbull Government has so assiduously sought to avoid. Further, it would be a Royal Commission based on terms of reference dictated by the Labor Party and its supporters.

If and when that occurs, financial services firms will be left to consider the costs which attached to the initiatives imposed by the Turnbull Government to justify not holding a Royal Commission – the rush towards the imposition of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the industry funding formula for the financial services regulators, the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR), the establishment of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) and the Life Insurance Framework (LIF), to name just a few.

Those same financial services firms might also care to contemplate the Turnbull Government’s changes to the superannuation regime which are still rolling through the system, adding complexity, cost and a fair measure of uncertainty in the minds of superannuation fund members.

What should occur to the financial services industry is that the Government has done its best work when it has been driven by sound policy reasoning rather than political expediency. Thus, there is good reason to welcome the formation of the FASEA just as there is good reason to welcome the fact that the Government stood back and allowed the life insurance industry to develop and police its own code of conduct.

There is less merit to be found, however, in its pursuit of a somewhat open-ended industry funding model for the financial services regulators and the drive towards a one-stop-shop financial services external dispute resolution (EDR) regime which has not been fully costed and the transitionary arrangements for which are dangerously imprecise.

Governments are ultimately judged on their marquee policy initiatives, thus the Hawke/Keating Government is admired for the floating of the Australian dollar and the implementation of the superannuation guarantee, while the Howard Government is well-remembered for the twin peaks regulatory model and the Financial Services Reform Act. It is fair to say the policy efforts of subsequent Governments of both political persuasions have been less admired. 

There is a danger that the Turnbull Government will be remembered for what it sought to avoid rather than what it might actually have achieved.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND