Cheapest and top-rated not always best

26 September 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Best interest duty in the life/risk arena should not be interpreted as meaning that consumers should have the lowest cost product with the highest research rating, according to AMP Limited.

Answering questions on notice from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, AMP made clear that it believed that the price of an insurance product and how it was rated should not be regarded as immutable factors in the best interest duty equation.

“The Committee raises a very interesting and complex issue on research houses and best interest duty (BID),” the company said. “AMP considers that BID should not be interpreted as meaning that consumers should have the lowest cost product with the highest research rating.

“Customers seeking insurance through an adviser require a comprehensive (or scaled) analysis of the customer's unique personal and family circumstances in order to provide advice that is in their best interest,” it said. “Obviously price is an important feature. However, other issues are also important, such as benefit design, trade-offs in terms of affordability and other goals that the customer may wish to achieve.”

AMP said that while research houses did play an important role in the industry, in addition, licensees like AMP, conducted their own independent research to construct [approved product lists] APLs so that advisers had access to high quality products that met the needs of the range of customers who sought financial advice.

“In some circumstances, customers may need a product which is not on our APL. In these circumstances AMP has a robust 'off-APL' process to ensure that the needs of these customers are serviced in compliance with the BID,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND