Super bills ‘leave pass’ for banks

15 September 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation bills reintroduced by the Federal Government into Parliament yesterday pose a risk to the not-for-profit superannuation sector and give the banks a “leave pass” on new transparency and disclosure requirements, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).

Responding to the government’s reintroduction of the bill, ISA argued the government’s agenda was not about improving governance and transparency but furthering the commercial interests of the banks.

“The Strengthening Trustee Arrangements Bill will dismantle the successful industry super and not-for-profit super governance model,” ISA said.

“The Improving Accountability and Member Outcomes in Superannuation Bill 2017 will enhance trustee obligations and regulatory powers in the default super sector but not 83 per cent of retail sector assets dominated by big bank-owned funds.” 

The government’s package includes making super funds more transparent on how they spend members’ money through new reporting of expenses, giving workers choice of their own super fund if they were currently prevented from doing so due to enterprise bargaining agreements or workplace determinations, and legislating a consistent minimum standard for one-third independent directors, including an independent chair.

ISA also argued the government had not presented any evidence their proposals would improve members’ returns.

“The evidence is clear: for the 10 years to 30 June 2017, SuperRatings monthly data shows, on average industry super funds have outperformed bank-owned super funds by more than two per cent a year,” it said.

It also cited examples where banks have had to provide customers compensation including ANZ paying an extra $10.5 million to 160,000 customers after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found it had incorrectly processed members’ super contributions and failed to deal with lost inactive member balances correctly.

It also cited the Commonwealth Bank (CBA) having to repay an estimated $105.6 million for charging fees where no advice was provided.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

21 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 15 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND