Life insurer shelf space fees legal, for now

14 August 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Shelf space fees being charged by advice licensees to life insurers to place their products on an Approved Product List (APL) remain legal, for now, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Answering questions on notice stemming from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, the regulator said that while volume-based shelf space fees paid to platform operators had been banned, “other shelf space fees are not specifically banned under the Act”.

“Therefore, shelf-space fees that advice licensees charge life insurers to place their products on the advice licensee's Approved Product Lists will only be banned if they: 1. satisfy the test of 'conflicted remuneration' in s 963A of the Act and 2. are not covered by an exemption in s963B of the Act,” ASIC said.

“Currently, these shelf-space fees would not be conflicted remuneration because of the exemption for monetary benefits relating to life risk insurance products,” it said.

However, it said that from 1 January 2018, these benefits will not be exempt because they are unlikely to satisfy the commission caps under the amended exemption.

“Shelf-space fees charged by licensees to life insurers will then need to be assessed under the test for conflicted remuneration in s963A. Whether a shelf-space fee will be conflicted remuneration will depend on the circumstances in each case.”

ASIC said relevant circumstances would include the size of the fee; how the fee is calculated (e.g. is it linked to sale of the insurer’s products); how the licensee uses the fee; whether the fee is passed onto advisers, and in what form; and, how the insurer’s products are presented on the APL and to the advisers (e.g. are they presented as ‘preferred products’ in any way).

ASIC said it had not conducted reviews of these types of shelf-space fees and therefore it was not in a position to provide a view on whether, generally, the fees are conflicted remuneration.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND