NSW Supreme Court clears up inheritance concerns over property

7 July 2017
| By Hope William-Smith |
image
image
expand image

‘Your debts don’t die with you’ is the reminder being touted after an estate case in the Supreme Court of New South Wales saw a beneficiary deemed liable for a mortgage on a gifted property, despite a specific intention for outstanding debt to be settled from the residual state of the benefactor, according to Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers.

The firm said that the case of Winn v Harding [NSW] demonstrated an extra layer of complexity for beneficiaries in the estates process that meant encumbered properties remained a financial risk if a residual estate did not have adequate funds to pay out a mortgage.

The question of whether gifted property or the rest of the estate were liable to bear outstanding mortgage debt arose in the case of Winn v Harding [NSW], after the residual estate of Karen Winn did not have sufficient funds to pay out Bankwest for the repayments on a mortgage for a property gifted to executor Maureen Harding.

“As it turned out, Karen’s residual estate at her death did not hold enough funds to cover the payment of the remaining mortgage debt,” the law firm said.

“In light of this, the courts decided that the property was liable for payment of the remaining mortgage debt, essentially reverting back to the default position.”

Harding inherited the house in Bathurst from Winn, after which the concern was raised over whether the property itself was liable for repayments.

“The effect of this section is that money from the general pool of assets contained within someone’s estate will not automatically assist to pay out a mortgaged property upon their death,” the law firm said.

“This notion is based on an old English legal principal and is mirrored in almost all Australian states.

“Accordingly, Maureen may not have inherited the property itself, unless she was in a financial position to help pay out the remainder of the mortgage to Bankwest.”

Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers said gifted properties could present this catch and that in planning an estate, it needed to be remembered that debt outlives its maker and the responsibility would always fall first on the residual estate.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND