Bank levy gone from bad tax to secret tax
The Federal Government has caught the five major banks off guard with its move to force senior executives to sign confidentiality agreements before releasing the draft major bank tax legislation for examination.
In a statement, the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA) has accused the Government of secrecy from the people they claim would be most affected by it, including the public.
Chief executive, Anna Bligh said the banks were shocked by the demand, which would prevent banks from consulting with their boards, customers and their shareholders on the implications of the legislation.
“A bad tax has now become a secret tax,” Bligh said.
“How can Australia’s major banks determine the impacts of this legislation of their senior staff and analysts are in danger of being prosecuted if they speak to stakeholders, the public or the media?”
Treasurer Scott Morrison defended the imposition of a non-disclosure agreement in Facebook post, saying the major banks had made individual submissions to the Government and it had respected requests for confidentiality of submissions, including ensuing comments they may provide.
“It’s a two-way street. The non-disclosure arrangements are used in this case are not an irregular practice for the government when consulting with commercial entities over draft legislation, and have been used recently by the Turnbull Government for the Multinational Anti-Avoidance Laws and the Diverted Profits Tax,” Morrison said.
“The arrangements do not restrict the banks from circulating any material within their organisations, including with their boards or commercial advisers.”
Bligh added the bank tax would raise more than $6 billion over the next four years, which would have significant impacts on banks, their customers, and shareholders.
“The Government has now made it illegal for the bill to be tested in the public sphere. This is likely to lead to highly flawed legislation and further risks unintended consequences on the economy and financial system,” Bligh said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
