Commercial property advice standards eroded

1 May 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

An Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) review has found clear evidence of an erosion of standards in the advice provided by major lenders on commercial property.

Speaking at the Committee for Economic Development of Australia’s (CEDA’s) property market outlook on Friday, APRA chair, Wayne Byres said major lenders were well aware of the need to monitor commercial property lending closely, and the need to stay attuned to current and prospective market conditions.

He said that the erosion of standards was due to competitive pressures.

“For example, lenders justifying a particular underwriting decision not on their own risk appetite and policies, but based on what they understood to be the criteria being applied by a competitor,” Byres said.

“We were also keen to see genuine scrutiny and challenge that aspirations of growth in commercial property lending were achievable, given the position in the credit cycle, without compromising the quality of lending.

“This was often being hampered by inadequate data, poor monitoring and incomplete portfolio controls. Lenders have been tasked to improve their capabilities in this regard.”

Byres said the more heterogeneous nature of commercial property lending made it difficult to implement the sorts of benchmarks that were applied to residential lending.

He noted that while commercial lending exposures of APRA-regulated lenders continued to grow in absolute terms, they had declined relative to the banking system’s capital, and that exposures were now well down from pre-GFC levels as a proportion of capital.

“Sound lending standards are vital for the stability and safety of the Australian banking system, and given the high proportion of both residential mortgage and commercial property lending in loan portfolios, there will be no letup in the intensity of APRA’s scrutiny in the foreseeable future,” Byres said.

“Prudence (not prices) is our catch cry: our objective is to make, ensure that, whatever the next stage of the property cycle may bring, the balance sheet of the banking system is resilient to it.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND