Govt warned of shortcomings in CIPRs draft legislation

18 April 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Treasury has been urged to undertake further consultation around the development of the Government’s Comprehensive Income Products for Retirement (CIPRs) regime amid concerns that its proposed settings risk significantly eroding any potential increases to income for retirees.

While the Government made the freeing up development of post-retirement products a centrepiece of last year’s Budget, responses to the Treasury’s exposure draft of the legislation has identified significant shortcomings in the arrangements.

Those shortcomings have been pointed out by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) which expressed particular concern at the exposure draft position that there would be no income tax exemption on deferred products until after meeting a nil condition of release.

The ASFA response said that, as a matter of policy, its members had observed that taxation during the pre-retirement deferral period would erode the potential additional income boost sought from the CIPR products by reducing the effect of the long-term compounding.

As well, it said that the arrangement would adversely affect member take up rates and make the building of investment solutions more complex.

“There will be a need to structure income products into pre and post-retirement to account for the taxation differential,” the submission warned. “This will add to complexity on member communication and administration.”

“Members are of the firm belief that the social security treatment of these products will be a critical factor influencing consumer demand, and accordingly the take-up rate, of such products.” the ASFA submission said. “As such, it is imperative that there be appropriate asset and/or income test treatment of deferred products during their deferral period.”

It said that ASFA appreciated that the issue was being considered separately as part of the Department of Social Services consultation, but added that it was nevertheless important for Treasury to be aware of the significance of the potential effect that social security treatment has upon consumer demand.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND