Robo-advice non-compliance will come to light

3 June 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The corporate regulator might start seeing cases of digital advice not complying with the best interests' duty over the next 12 to 18 months and it might issue enforceable undertakings at this stage to stamp it out, a financial services lawyer believes.

Holley Nethercote partner, Grant Holley, said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) was taking a facilitative approach to new technology which was congruent with the Government's policy to foster innovation, but added it was early days yet.

At this point, ASIC was scrutinising licensing applications from digital advice providers to ensure their services were accurately represented on their websites without being misleading.

"But I suspect that over the next 12 to 18 months we might see quite a lot of ASIC's attention focused on digital advice providers," Holley said.

Holley suggested the robo-advice algorithm should be intuitive enough to inform clients if the service was suitable for them based on their answers to the questions.

"I think there might be some issues around that: people for whom it's not appropriate actually using the tool. It must develop algorithms that reject people for whom it's not appropriate while ensuring that the right questions are asked that relate to the subject matter of what is being covered," he said.

"It's an issue that most well-advised robo-advice outfits are well aware of and they're working at the moment on getting their message clear, and working on their algorithms, or they should be."

At the outset robo-advice providers must keep in mind that the average Australian numeracy and literacy levels were at about 12 years of age, and must design questions in a way that ensured users would understand their investment options, and the scope of the financial advice.

"I think one of the issues will just be the ability of people to go on the website and understand what they're reading, and that might lead to some people using a robo-advice tool when really it's not appropriate for them and they should be seeing a person," Holley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND