Wall of cash could leave super system

13 May 2016
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The proposed introduction of the $1.6 million lifetime cap for superannuation could cause not-for-profit super funds to transition further towards being full-service financial services firms, according to Tria Investment Partners.

If the proposal in last week's Federal Budget becomes legislation, those with pension balances of more than $1.6 million at 1 July 2017 will have to roll the excess out of their untaxed pension account.

An analysis by Tria said most funds had hybrid or variable fee structures and relied on members with large account balances to subsidise low balance members (whales).

"This latest change will not only reduce the balances of the whales (and therefore the fees a fund can charge), it also creates a decision point for members — one that might spur them to go elsewhere in search of a more comprehensive solution," Tria partner, Oliver Hesketh, said.

For not-for-profit super funds that operated on the basis that by providing a super solution they could take care of members' retirement needs, the proposal will change the status quo for members with more than $1.6 million in retirement.

"We estimate 65,000 members will be caught up in the change — two-thirds of whom are self-managed super fund (SMSF) members. Many of these members will simply transfer assets back into the accumulation division of their current super fund. But this may well be a suboptimal outcome," Hesketh, said.

Tria said this could lead to around $23 billion of assets leaving the super system by 1 July 2017 — more than half the system's net inflow expected this year.

"Product providers of all persuasions should be targeting this new potential wall of cash. Not least of all, the not-for-profit funds who will still want to help their members' meet their retirement goals, an aspiration that may now involve the offering of non-super products," Hesketh said.

"The government might unwittingly have caused not-for-profit super funds to transition even further towards being full-service financial services firms. And as a result we can expect to see those funds targeting a greater share of their members' financial services ‘wallet'."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 9 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 10 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 9 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND