Limits urged to super tax concessionality
Superannuation fund members should only be entitled to tax concessionality on those sums necessary to generate an appropriate retirement benefit, according to a senior superannuation industry executive.
The chief executive of Pillar Administration, Peter Brook has used a column in an upcoming edition of Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, to argue for both limits to tax concessionality and inhibitors to the use superannuation as an estate planning tool.
He said there was a need to ensure that superannuation is a tax effective environment only for its purpose and to reasonable limits.
"While I support the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Retirement Standard recommendations, the principle remains relevant at other levels. Prior to retirement, I'd like to see all earnings over this sum returned to the member and taxed at marginal rates on a regular, say, half yearly basis," Brook said.
"The only sums that should have any shelter, at 15 per cent, are those necessary to generate the appropriate retirement benefit. The remainder needs to be taxed in the hands of the member.
He said that for those who might already have a higher balance, there could be a grace period to return those sums to the member — "let's say the distribution of surplus benefits within one year of implementation, and for this transition there would be a concessional tax of 15 per cent". "Thereafter, it would be returned at the marginal rate of the taxpayer. This should apply to all member balances, whether in managed super funds or self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs)," Brook said. "These returned funds will then be invested in other areas, not sheltered by the superannuation tax environment."
"For those in retirement, the existing tax free character of retirement benefits should continue, but all additional income should be taxed at the relevant marginal rates taking account of the totality of the income. So if a retiree receives $80,000 retirement benefit from super and receives another $20,000 outside of super then there would be no tax on the first sum but the additional income would be taxed at 37 cents in the dollar under current tax rates."
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
