Grass roots planners not sufficiently consulted

19 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

There has been a lack of consultation with grass roots advisers around the Government's proposals for lifting professional and ethical standards, according to experienced Victorian-based adviser, Ian McKenzie.

In a submission responding to the Government's exposure draft legislation on lifting professional and ethical standards in the financial services industry, McKenzie said he was concerned at the lack of consultation with grass roots advisers with respect to both the findings of the Financial System Inquiry and the Parliamentary Joint Committee.

Further he said there had been no economic or social impact done on the on the proposed legislation, especially with respect to its impact on the existing stock of financial advisers, small business or the wider community.

McKenzie's submission expresses deep concern that the changes being proposed by the Government may see a significant exodus of experienced advisers and urged grandfathering in similar terms to that being urged by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

He said there was a real danger within the exposure draft legislation that adviser stocks would be damaged, undermining Australia's aspirations to become an Asian financial hub.

However it on the legislative proposal to establish a new over-arching standards-setting body that McKenzie is most vocal, arguing that it is unnecessary in circumstances where the Accounting Professional and Ethnical Standards Board (APESB) already exists.

He said the APESB had been formed by the three professional accounting bodies and should be possible for the financial planning bodies such as the FPA and AFA to join the APESB and effectively bring the accounting and financial planning professionals under a single code of conduct.

"Why spend millions of dollars setting up a new standards board when one already exists and probably covers around 75 per cent of financial services practitioners and probably most likely already has the infrastructure and human resources personnel in place to handle the codes of conduct of financial advisers," McKenzie's submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND