$450 threshold needs to be removed

The superannuation $450 monthly income threshold needs to be removed as 18 per cent of women who have a job do not reach the threshold, Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustee (AIST) and Women in Super said in the lead up to International Women’s Day.

Data from an AIST commissioned Essential Media survey found that twice the amount of women than men were affected by the threshold limit, with the highest proportion affecting women between the ages of 18 and 35.

Another 42 per cent of women who earned less than $450 a month from one employer were not receiving super.

Related News:

AIST acting chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said super should be universal and the threshold needed to be removed, particularly as modern payroll systems made it easier for employers to meet their obligations.

“With increasing casualisation of the workforce, the $450 threshold will continue to impact on both women and men – many of whom are low income earners and need all the super they can get,” she said.

Women in Super chair, Cate Wood, said: “One-in-three women currently retire in poverty and it is time to break with the past and take the fair and rightful step forward by implementing structural changes that deliver real improvements to women”.




Related Content

Trump on course to spark second GFC

US President Donald Trump is sowing the seeds for the second Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and risking future prospects for international financial st...more

New CEO for AFA

Former Zurich executive, Philip Kewin has been appointed as the new chief executive of the Association of Financial Advisers, succeeding Brad Fox.Kewi...more

Lump sum business down

New premiums for individual death, total and permanent disability (TPD) and trauma business have fallen by an average of one per cent per annum for th...more

Author

Comments

Comments

Would those earning less than $450 per month appreciate the reduction in wages that this would lead to?

Remove the threshold. Help us retire for the better.

if you are earning this low amount then why put money into super? The tax is higher than getting the money in your pocket and then you can put it into super yourself and get the government co-contribution.

Add new comment