Super funds urge against three-year exclusion

27 July 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has been told that people who have provided services to superannuation funds should not be excluded for sitting on their boards as "independent directors" for a period of three years after they retire or otherwise leave their employment.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has queried one of the key elements of the Government's draft legislation on superannuation fund governance which prescribes a three-year exclusion for such people.

The submission states, "ASFA recommends the definition of ‘independent' should not contain a prescribed three-year exclusion period for a person who has ceased to be employed by a supplier at an executive or director level".

The submission said the ability of such individuals to be considered "independent" should be determined by the super funds "on a case by case basis, with regard to prudential requirements in respect of the identification and management of conflicts of interest".

While supporting the core element of the Government's draft legislation, ASFA is arguing that the independent chairman of superannuation funds should be drawn from the one-third independent directors and has also claimed there should be no assumptions with regard to a one size fits all approach.

"It should also be recognised that there are many different structures and sizes across the sector and a ‘one size fits all' approach may have unintended consequences," it said.

"As such, we urge both the final legislation and APRA prudential standards to be principles based."

Further it has argued that the three year transition arrangements to the new structure should not begin until 1 July, next year.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND