ISA claims super choice is too confusing

3 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has mounted a further defence of the existing default funds under modern awards regime in the face of the Productivity Commission's draft report on the competitiveness and efficiency of the superannuation system.

ISA chief executive, David Whiteley, claimed that there was evidence that those superannuation fund members who actively made choices about their superannuation funds were not necessarily being as well served as those falling within the default system.

"There is ample evidence that many who currently make an active choice are choosing funds that do not deliver the best net returns," he claimed.

"This is due to an overwhelming and confusing array of funds, high search costs, multiple advice channels and 40,000 investment options, many of which are designed to generate profits for companies, not the customer.

"Where consumers have been inundated with choice, there has been little sign of a corresponding drop in fees or better net returns," Whiteley said.

He said the PC draft report had noted that these are "potentially signs of unhealthy competition."

"Looking after the compulsory super savings of Australians requires funds to be of the highest quality and exhibit undivided loyalty to members," Whiteley said, claiming the PC report had identified that member outcomes, measured by net returns and ultimately how much they have in retirement, had to be the primary focus of a well-designed super system.

"There is a moral and fiscal imperative to get default settings right. An estimated eight million workers rely on being placed in a default fund, usually by their employer, and don't actively make a choice," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND