Industry funds argue board diversity for ASX firms

30 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Amid the continuing debate about superannuation funds governance, industry funds are calling for more diversity on the boards of publicly-listed companies, particularly the inclusion of women, and for those directors to have more skin in the game in terms of personal shareholdings.

The Australian Council of Superannuation Industry (ACSI) — made up of mostly of industry superannuation funds — has made public its latest annual research on the make-up of the boards of companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and stated: "ACSI and its member superannuation funds believe skilled and diverse boards make for better-governed companies and, consequently, better investment outcomes over the long-term."

The report also argues the benefits of directors holding shares in the companies in which they are involved, stating, "ACSI maintains that well-governed boards require their directors to hold equity in the company" citing the research finding that nearly 11 per cent of ASX100 non-executive directors have no "skin in the game".

"This is a poor result and we hope the number begins to improve," according to ACSI chief executive, Louise Davidson. "While we don't mandate how many shares an individual director should own, we do believe that having skin in the game aligns directors more closely with the investors they represent, and that well-governed boards require their directors to hold equity in the company."

The ACSI research also pointed to a trend for directors to sit on multiple company boards, noting that 105 directors took up one-third of all ASX100 seats.

"This highlights the challenge of expanding the director gene pool. ACSI's review of new appointments shows that half of all directors appointed to ASX100 companies already sit on another ASX100 board," Davidson said.

The report pointed out that while the number of women on the boards of publicly-listed companies had doubled in the past 10 years, women still only represented 23 per cent of directors.

The research also showed that 62 per cent of women on boards were aged 40-60, against just 27 per cent of men, and noted that nearly three-quarters of male non-executive directors were aged 60-70 plus.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

3 hours 30 minutes ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

4 days 21 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND