Are unions blocking fund mergers for financial gain?

2 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has used its submission to a Parliamentary Committee to claim that some union officials are blocking superannuation fund mergers to protect the revenue derived by unions from their seats on superannuation fund boards.

The claim is contained in the FSC's submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015 and specifically pointed to the failed merger between Equipsuper and VisionSuper.

It said that Equipsuper and Vision Super were finalising a merger to create a $10 billion superannuation fund with 160,000 members and that the two super funds had been in merger talks for three years and undertaken expensive due diligence.

"The merger was scheduled to be complete in July 2012," it said. "On the eve of the merger, however, Equipsuper pulled out. Equipsuper's Chair, Andrew Fairley, publicly cited Vision Super's sponsoring unions' and employer organisations' inability to reach agreement on the number of seats each would receive on the board of the merged entity as the major roadblock to the merger."

"Board seats are an important source of revenue and influence to sponsoring organisations. In many instances the salary paid to the board member is paid back to the sponsoring organisation and helps fund their day-to-day activities. Sponsoring organisations therefore have an incentive to put their own interests ahead of the interest of the fund member," the FSC submission said.

"Unfortunately for consumers, the current board composition of superannuation funds is preventing consolidation and can inhibit achieving economies of scale," it claimed. "Independent directors would be expected to take a critical look at the operating costs of subscale funds and assess whether those funds are viable over the longer term. Whilst it should be expected that all trustee directors would undertake such analysis, there are examples of directors of superannuation funds putting the interests of their sponsoring organisation ahead of the interests of consumers."

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

8 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 2 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND