The $1 million super fallacy

1 February 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Those talking about people needing $1 million in superannuation to fund a comfortable retirement are needlessly skewing the argument, according to new analysis published this week which suggests the focus should be on income delivered by superannuation assets, rather than the quantum.

The analysis has been issued by fund manager, Martin Currie and is contained in a white paper published this week which states that people needing super balances of $1 million sent the wrong message to people approaching retirement.

"We should be looking at actual income delivered rather than just superannuation balances," the white paper authors, Reece Birtles and Will Baylis said claiming that, additionally, "the $1 million assumptions completely ignore the role of alternative asset classes that produce income".

Further, the two authors have directly questioned the rationale of former Cooper Review chairman, Jeremy Cooper and pointed to his current role with Challenger.

"In 2010, the Government's Cooper Review into superannuation stated that we needed around $500,000 in superannuation for a comfortable retirement. Today, Jeremy Cooper, the chair of the review, claims that $1 million is not even enough to reach [the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia] ASFA's standards," it said.

"Mr Cooper's figures assume that the entire lump sum is invested in low-risk government bonds. He proposes that an annuity stream (such as what Mr Cooper's employer Challenger provides) is the only way to generate income in retirement."

"What has changed? Have prices in Australia gone up that much? Have life expectancies increased dramatically in five years? No, the reason for the sudden change in his figure is that the yield on government bonds has fallen dramatically since 2010 to around 2.6 per cent," the authors said.

The white paper said that a $1 million retirement balance was out of reach of most ordinary Australians and pointed out that in August 2015, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) estimated that the typical balance of those approaching retirement is just $100,000.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND