TTR changes the major challenge for advisers

4 May 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Changes to Transition to Retirement (TTR) arrangements have emerged as the major challenge for financial planners resulting from last night's Budget.

Post-Budget analysis from most of the major financial services companies has pointed to the TTR changes as being a significant challenge with the likelihood being that clients will simply choose to opt out of such arrangements before the end of the next financial year.

The consensus around the consequences of the Budget announcement were reflected in the analysis provided by Perpetual Private, which said the ability to utilise superannuation as a tax minimisation vehicle would be reduced, especially for those individuals in the pre-retirement phase looking to aggressively build their wealth by utilising a combination of salary sacrifice and TTR income streams.

"The removal of the tax-free earnings status for a client's TTR income stream will adversely affect those who are presently rebalancing their portfolio, or who were looking to otherwise change their asset mix in the near term," it said.

"As no detail has currently been provided on whether any capital gains tax relief will be available to affected clients, it appears likely that where a capital gain is crystallised from 1 July 2017, it will be taxed at 10 per cent.

The Perpetual Private analysis said that given there would be an alignment of the tax treatment of superannuation within the accumulation phase and TTR income streams from 1 July 2017, this would in all likelihood provide a disincentive for many existing clients with TTR income streams to maintain them after this date.

"Clients in this situation may elect to commute them back to accumulation phase where they don't require an income to meet their needs. Alternatively, they may choose to retire, at which time the superannuation interest ceases being a TTR and instead becomes a normal account-based pension which will receive a full taxation exemption on earnings," it said.

The analysis pointed out that clients below age 60 with room under their Low Rate Cap who maintained a TTR income stream beyond 1 July 2017 would be worse off because they would be taxed on their pension income at their prevailing marginal rate less a 15 per cent tax offset, compared to their former position where they received this income tax-free.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) singled out the TTR changes as being a Budget negative, with chief executive, Dante De Gori, saying the abolition represented a "net negative to low and middle income earners".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND