Opposition warned on negative gearing changes

8 June 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Labor's proposed policy changes to negative gearing are based on inadequate economic modelling and should not be changed in isolation without a comprehensive review of the taxation policy.

That was the call from the peak body of the property industry, the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA), which said $6.5 trillion worth of Australians' wealth was in property, which was around three times the amount held in superannuation and equities.

The body's chair, Ben Kingsley, said: "Don't play with this unless you know what you're doing. Such major reform requires comprehensive and detailed modelling. Until there is real evidence to support such a policy, which industry experience tells us doesn't exist, the opposition should be very careful about changing negative gearing and capital gains tax provisions".

Kingsley said property investment contributed to self-sufficient retirees and reduced reliance on the Government to support an ageing population, while also providing one in four jobs.

"Labor's proposed removal of negative gearing on established housing is a poorly-informed policy that will drive property price reductions, increase rents, stifle new property construction, rather than encourage it and cause job losses.

"Is that a good policy?" he asked.

Tax agency business, H&R Block, pointed to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) figures in February, which showed that 72 per cent of investors with negatively geared properties earned $80,000 or less (2011-12 figures), and argued the removal of negative gearing would hit many middle income families who would have to sell their property as their tax bills rose.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND