Morrison cites ‘dodgy advice’ in crackdown justification

Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison has referenced cracking down on the provision of “dodgy financial advice” as part of his broader justification for imposing both a bank levy and the Banking Executive Accountability Regime.

In a statement released just ahead of introducing the necessary legislation to the Parliament, Morrison emphasised the necessity of the Budget measures to help crack down on undesirable practices within the major banks.

He said that under the new regime, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) would have the powers to take court action to impose new civil penalties for breaching the expectations on how a bank conducts its business.

Related News:

“In the most serious examples of reckless behaviour, this penalty could be up to $200 million,” he said.

“If a scandal is caused by bank executives, APRA will be able to step in and not only scrutinize the actions of those individuals, but hold the bank responsible for not supervising their managers properly,” Morrison said. “These new measures are in addition to the powers we will gave the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) to crack down on dodgy financial advice and lending to people who can’t really afford it.

“And we will make it simpler and fairer for those feeling let down by their bank or financial institution, through the creation of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority - a one-stop shop for customers to access free, fast and binding dispute resolution services.”

Morrison’s statement came after the APRA chairman, Wayne Byres had told a Senate Estimates Committee hearing that the regulator already possessed many of the powers outlined by the Government.

“…many of the measures involve a strengthening of APRA’s existing powers, rather than completely new additions to APRA’s armoury,” he said. “APRA already has, for example, a fit and proper regime covering senior executives, powers that allow for the disqualification of individuals, and a capacity to set and enforce standards for remuneration policies.”

However he acknowledged that the proposals announced in the Budget would considerably strengthen those powers, particularly as they apply to banks.




Related Content

Super funds need to better explain insurance

Superannuation funds will be obliged to provide new members with an easily understood but detailed explanation of the funds’ insurance offerings, un...more

Advice key to navigating retirement incomes

The Government has moved further to facilitate the development of post-retirement products but, as Hope William-Smith reports, the provision of good a...more

ASIC delays super start dates

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has delayed the start date for the regulatory settings underpinning last year’s superann...more

Author

Comments

Comments

Now if only there was such oversight and accountability held for the that one industry that ultimately affects all others and all people within Australia; politics.

And while we're talking about that filthy little tranche of irresponsible largely incompetent naysayers, having compulsory educational degrees or qualifications and relevant training (especially for ministerial portfolios) would just make common sense, wouldn't it?

Sorry Joe, with the shuttering of Careers Australia, politician level education options are now becoming scarce!

Add new comment