FPA reinforces differences between accountants and planners

26 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has again emphasised the key differences between financial planners and accountants, telling the Inspector General of Taxation that the policy and regulatory environment must reflect the significant differences between the services provided by tax agents and tax (financial) advisers.

In a submission filed with the Inspector General of Taxation this week, the FPA said the Tax Agent Service regime had commenced for financial planners in 2014 with a three-year transition period for registration with the Tax Practitioners Board – something which had represented a significant challenge.

“This presented a significant challenge for both the financial planning profession and the TPB of adapting the TPB policies within the TASA law to be appropriately applied to and able to be implemented for the services and business models of financial planners,” it said.

“This is an ongoing regulatory challenge that creates potential risks of inadvertent non-compliance as the financial planning profession, policy makers and regulators grapple with inconsistencies between the requirements of different Regulators, and the impractical application of some laws to the diverse business operations for providing financial advice,” it said.

It was in these circumstances that the FPA is arguing that the policy and regulatory renvironment had to reflect the significant differences between the services provided by tax agents and tax (financial) planners including:

a) the different services provided to clients

b) the different business models used within each profession

c) the additional regulatory oversight of the financial planning profession under the Corporations Act. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 4 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 5 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 4 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND