Data used to help ASIC identify poor advice

20 October 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The corporate watchdog has been collecting data the life industry has provided since September 2016 to help identify advisers who are more likely to give advice that is not in the best interest of their clients.

Keynote speaker at Money Management’s Annual Risk Policy and Awards Breakfast yesterday morning, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) senior executive leader of financial advisers, Joanna Bird, said the data from life insurance companies gave the regulator a sense of how many policies were lapsing.

“So, we combined that with a number of risk factors that identify people that are more likely to be at risk of providing poor advice so we can target our limited resources in the right place,” she said.

“It’s all a matter of getting together risk indicators and then we have to look at the advice. We can’t tell people are giving good or bad advice based on risk indicators, we look at the advice.”

Bird noted that there had been considerable misunderstanding of the data exercise and said ASIC only had resources to conduct surveillance in relation to 10 advisers who were brought to their attention through the data.

She stressed that this figure was not a measure of misconduct in the industry, but a measure of ASIC’s resources.

“So now we’ve completed surveillance on these advisers to test whether their advice complied with the law and where we found advice that didn’t comply and where it is serious enough for banning action, that is what we’re doing now,” she said.

“It’s not an easy process to ban advisers and it should be hard. It should be hard to take the right to take away someone’s ability to work in their chosen professions.

“We may also consider taking action relating to some licensees as a result of their failure to monitor adviser representatives adequately. We’ve recently received our second set of data and we’ll start the whole process again to look at 10 advisers as we don’t have the capacity to look at more at the moment.”

Bird said ASIC banned 46 advisers last year and 13 of those were related to life insurance advice.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND