The Australian Democrats 'jump the gun' on low doc loans

22 August 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) has hit back at recent claims made by the Australian Democrats that a large number of borrowers were coerced into low doc home loans during the global financial crisis (GFC).

MFAA chief executive Phil Naylor said that since 2004, the association's disciplinary tribunal has dealt with 350 complaints against members - none of which "have been specifically related to low doc loans".

Australian Democrats housing spokesman David Collyer recently called for a Royal Commission into the Australian mortgage finance industry after evidence was given to the Senate Economics Committee on low doc loans.

The committee was told borrower incomes and assets were regularly and systematically inflated to make loans appear appropriate and repayable when they were not.

"Apart from confusing 'low doc' with 'sub-prime', the spokesperson has jumped the gun," Naylor said.

While he supports the Senate inquiry, he said that a Royal Commission is not necessary because, for one to be called, "there would have to be massive evidence of systematic low doc fraud".

"In our view and on the experience of our members who in the main are mortgage brokers (and comprise about 75 per cent of all mortgage brokers) there is no evidence of this," he said.

Naylor said he believes the arrears rate for low doc loans has not performed "materially differently to prime loans", albeit at a rate which is slightly higher due to the greater risk associated with the low doc loans.

"Had there been massive fraud it would be reasonable to expect the arrears rate to be going through the roof, and it is not," he said.

According to Collyer, of the $14 billion worth of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) acquired by the Government since the global financial crisis (GFC), 10 per cent of these might be low doc loans.

Naylor said at their greatest penetration pre-GFC, low doc loans made up around 7 per cent of the market. By the time RMBS was being acquired, the penetration would have been "considerably less than that".

"We estimate the low doc loans now are less than 2 per cent of all loans so the 10 per cent assertion cannot be even close," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 19 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 20 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND