ASIC: We can’t regulate open APLs

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has expressed doubt that compelling financial institutions to hold multiple options on their approved product lists (APLs) will result in their planners actually moving beyond their own products.

Under questioning before a Parliamentary committee, ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell expressed doubt that one of the key Trowbridge recommendations would necessarily represent a panacea.

Kell confirmed that ASIC is currently finalising a project looking at how APLs work in practice and whether advisers do use the full range of products on approved product lists.

Related News:

“I think there are two issues here,” he said. “One is having a broad range of products on an approved product list—products which are appropriately chosen to ensure that they are suitable for customers. The second issue is even if you have a broad range of products on that approved product list, will the advisers actually choose from across those products in a way that is of benefit for the customers?”

The ASIC deputy chairman said both matters were issues for the regulator, adding that “setting a simple rule like the Trowbridge rule won't necessarily address that second issue.”

“It's something we're very interested in,” he said. “We are looking at it closely. But it's not something where we have the ability, in any case, to directly regulate: you must have this many products on your APLs.”




Related Content

ASIC announces financial reports findings

Findings from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) June review of financial reports show the impairment of non-financial assets...more

ASIC should refund licensees in some circumstances

The industry funding model for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should also carry with it an obligation on the regulator to...more

MG RE fined $650,000

The Federal Court has ordered MG entity responsible (RE) to pay a penalty of $650,000 for contravening its continuous disclosure obligations, and to p...more

Author

Comments

Comments

Re - ASIC: We can't regulate open APLs

Fund managers and product providers influence choice of product, do we start here to ensure that all products are considered on an open architecture APL?

why have an APL - why not just make the adviser, as he is now anyway, liable under the best interests duty - or the old know your product know your client. The APL is just a way for vertically integrated business to filter and influence. If ASIC can't regulate them, then they are a waste of time and effort.

Be good if all product providers had decent data feeds, and made it easy to register with them. This would make it much easier for Advisers to use other products. I suspect a lot of Advisers dont use other products due to restricted choice, but also because it can create a administration nightmare.

Add new comment