ASIC robo guidance not adequate

2 September 2016
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The corporate regulator's guidance on digital advice does not address any useful detail about standards for robo-advice, FinaMetrica believes.

The risk tolerance firm said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) RG255 that was published this week left many questions about the integrity of robo algorithms and investment standards unanswered.

FinaMetrica's director and co-founder, Paul Resnik, said RG255 primarily clarified some important licensing questions and established very basic, minimum operation standards.

"FinaMetrica powers risk tolerance assessment tools, in human, cyborg and robo channels around the world to ensure our customers have an accurate risk profile of the client and a risk-matched investment solution. But ASIC is not dealing with those types of issues in RG255," Resnik said.

"The operational standards appear quite low. For instance, to meet RG255 a robo firm only requires one person who understands the robo algorithm and one person who can review the advice — and they can even be the same person.

"Our guess is this will assist foreign and entrepreneurial robos to develop a presence in Australia without initially requiring a large local staff."

Resnik said the regulatory guide hardly discussed investment decision standards, knowing your client, and investment standards, which he said were at the heart of a good financial advice process.

"Robo operators need to give good advice, supported by robust defensible algorithms — it's not just about access and transaction speed," he said.

"A failure in automated advice would undermine confidence and could deliver investor losses that easily dwarf the recent scandals over mis-selling by human advisers."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 22 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 23 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND