Advisers concerned over Age Pension assets test

4 August 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Advisers and financial planners have expressed some frustration over the substantial changes to the Age Pension assets test, which are due to be implemented from 1 January 2017, with the social security reforms a larger shift than expected.

That was the view of IOOF technical services manager, Josh Rundmann, who said that groups like couple homeowners who have assets above $800,000 would either have substantially reduced benefits worth about tens of thousands of dollars, a year less in age pension, or have no age pension at all.

"That dabbling of the taper rate really cuts hard compared to the current means testing arrangement," Rundmann said.

"[The changes are] just a larger shift than what you expect on a normal day-to-day basis. It was quite telegraphed quite far in advance and it has been legislated for quite a while so there's been a bit more certainty around this than say, the current situation around super."

One strategy that has flown under the radar was that those who lost their Age Pension because of the changes could receive the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC), and state-based subsidies. Discounts would be tied to the pensioner concession card.

Both cards would enable access to the pharmaceutical benefits scheme and similar social benefits.

"In New South Wales, the car registration discount, which applies for pensioners who have a pensioner concession card, doesn't appear to apply for the Commonwealth Seniors Health care card holders," Rundmann said.

"So not only have you lost your pension but some of these discounts may unwind and you find yourself having less income because you don't have the age pension anymore, plus higher expenses because those discounts no longer apply. So there's a bit of concern around that double edged sword."

Advisers must talk clients through their options on alternatives when they stopped receiving the Age Pension, and how the CSHC card functioned.

"It's definitely a very strong topic that's coming through advisers, particularly when they're reviewing clients with assets between those thresholds: the $800,000 to $1.1 million threshold for couple homeowners for example," Rundmann said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND