Recovery in super returns pauses in October

23 November 2009 | by Mike Taylor

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share

Warren Chant

The recovery in superannuation fund returns took a pause in October, but most balances would still be in positive territory in year to date terms, according to research house Chant West.

The Chant West data showed that after seven straight months of gains, returns for the median growth fund were down 1.2 per cent in October, but were still up by 8.9 per cent in financial year to date terms.

Commenting on the data, Chant West principal Warren Chant said despite the slight drop in October, the median fund has risen by 17.4 per cent since the end of February when the rally in share markets began.

"Going into November, markets have picked up momentum again, so at this stage it looks as though October was just a brief 'time out'," he said.

Chant said master trusts were continuing to outperform industry funds in the recovery because of their higher exposure to listed assets, and in the eight months to the end of October, the median master trust rose by 22.2 per cent against 14.3 per cent for the median industry fund.

He said if superannuation investors learned only one lesson from the past two years, it should be that heroes could quickly turn into zeroes and that it was unwise to rush into decisions based on short-term results.

"Different phases of the market cycle suit different investment approaches, and what works well in one phase may not do so well as the cycle moves on," Chant said.


Add a comment4 Comments

  1. Scott | 24 November, 2009 at 11:46 AM
    Disclaimer. I work for an industy super fund. I was a finacial planner and have earned commissions. Matt, Chris G and Colin I dont think you read the article in the context it was written. Currently master trusts are outperforming industry funds over an 8 month period to the end of October. If you are asserting this as conclusive proof that industry funds have terible performance I would question your experience and ability to advise. Industry super funds tend to offer vanilla funds based on risk profile and the majority have only had one core option for their life of which performance over the long term (5, 10 years plus) appear to meet stated performance objectives ie exceed CPI by x%. Could any of you gentlemen provide proof of the performance of the mastertrusts that you have used and or your model portfolios over these time frame to support your inconclusive assertion that industry fund performance is terrible or underperforming over the long term. Most credible advisers would state that past performance is no indication of the future performance but what an experienced adviser would take from past performance is how the past performance relates to benchmark and objective over time. You and the retail master trusts must know that the listed sectors ARE NOT going to experience any corrections if you claim this 8 months worth of performance as proof of superiority. The message about performance has and always will be that over the long term performance reverts to the mean thereforre performance to a high degree cannot be controlled but cost can. If the consumer is not getting and or using advice why pay for it. Particularly why pay lose 1% in fees for commissions or shareholders when advice is not required or sought?
  2. Colin | 24 November, 2009 at 10:28 AM
    As always you get what you pay for, over time a good diversified portfolio will always out perform a fund with short term focus
  3. Chris G. | 23 November, 2009 at 03:59 PM
    I know. The industry funds could run a campaign called "compare the pear" .....
  4. Matt | 23 November, 2009 at 01:49 PM
    Industry funds may have lower fees, but they still have terrible performance.

Tags: Chant West | research | retail master trusts | superannuation | Warren Chant

Just in:


Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

News Roundup

Sponsored links

The Blue Book Directory

Recent comments

Recent tweets