FEA points finger elsewhere on ASIC probe

6 July 2009 | by Mike Taylor

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share

 

Managed investment scheme group FEA has moved to clarify its position with respect to an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) investigation claiming that it involves external parties rather than any of FEA’s subsidiaries, employees or contractors.

FEA made its position clear in an announcement released to the Australian Securities Exchange, saying while it had agreed with ASIC that it would not comment to the media, it believed stakeholder concerns, particularly those involving the financial planning industry, deserved to be addressed.

It said neither FEA nor its subsidiaries, employees or contractors were under investigation, nor did it believe they would be under investigation for any wrongdoing.

The statement said the current investigation was instigated by FEA when it became aware of irregularities with a small number of investments made in FEA Plantations Project 2008, that the investments were made during June 2008 and that the applications were submitted by an Australian Financial Services Licence holder.

FEA said the quantum of investments involved amounted to $1.7 million and that this amount had been appropriately identified by FEA’s auditors in preparation of the December 2008 financial statements.

The ASIC investigation into the matters surrounding FEA gave rise to reports, later denied, that ASIC had conducted raids on financial planning practices.


Tags: asic | Australian Securities and Investments Commission | FEA | financial planing | managed investment schemes | MIS

Just in:


Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

1MM-AdviserPenalties Are penalties against advisers enforced by ASIC stringent enough and do they deter bad practice?
Yes, they are stringent enough and act as a deterrent against bad practice and unethical behaviour.
 
9%
Yes, but they are not enough of a deterrent.
 
5%
Yes, but there should be a register of those who have breached the law.
 
16%
No, they achieve nothing as recalcitrant advisers can simply set-up again after a few years.
 
70%
The poll is closed.

News Roundup

Sponsored links

The Blue Book Directory

Recent comments

Recent tweets