
We’ve all heard the old joke: what did the man say when he walked into a bar? Ouch!
Perhaps he was focused on the here and now of getting a drink and forgot to lift his eyes to see what was coming.
Our
previous articles in Money Management have focused on the ‘here and
now’ challenges of complying with legal obligations. In this article,
we lift our eyes to the not too distant future, to a world of trading
in carbon emissions, renewable energy and water rights, and ask what
challenges and opportunities will exist for financial services
businesses.
There is much about the coming regimes that is
unclear, including exactly when they will be introduced and exactly how
they will look. Admittedly, that’s not great fodder for action plans
and ‘to do’ lists at this stage.
However, there are certain
common features in the proposed regulation of carbon, energy and water
that we can understand now, and that will provide us with valuable
information for strategic planning.
Those who think now about coming opportunities and keep their eyes on the landscape in an informed way could do very well.
One
can summarise the whole financial services industry as one that
collects money from people who do not need it today and gives it to
people who do need it today, and charges a fee on the way through. The
money that is collected is invested in either debt or equity in the
form of ownership of some form of property or a productive enterprise.
Property
is a scarce resource that is desirable to own, and a system of title
has been developed to regulate the ownership and distribution of it.
The
belated recognition of the impact of carbon emissions produced by
industrial development on the climate and environment is about to
result in the rationing of carbon emissions.
For the first
time, the right to produce carbon emissions will be a scarce resource
that is desirable to own. It will be a new form of property, which can
be bought and sold on a market. It is something that can be invested
in, and that must mean opportunities for the financial services
industry.
Similarly, the increasing move to renewable energy is creating new property rights and opportunities for productive enterprise.
Who has heard of an REC?
REC
stands for Renewable Energy Certificate. It’s effectively a form of
electronic currency created by the Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act
2000.
An REC has a value, which is determined by the market,
and can be traded between registered persons. It may be traded
separately from the physical electricity in an REC market.
Even
householders have the capacity to generate renewable energy – for
example, by installing solar panels in their roofs. Any excess over
their actual use can be sold back into the grid.
All this adds
up to new property rights and new markets, and if there aren’t
opportunities in there for the financial services industry, we’re just
not thinking hard enough.
As with anything that has a
fluctuating value dependent on the forces of supply and demand, a
market will develop for derivative products based on the underlying
value of a unit of carbon emission or a unit of energy.
Opportunities
will be created for the development of new financial products and
consequent opportunities for advisers with the appropriate expertise.
There
will be a need for new technologies and infrastructure that will be
securitised and invested in via managed investment schemes and a host
of other ways.
Of course, in marketing such opportunities, we
need to be mindful of obligations under the Trade Practices Act and the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Act not to be
misleading and deceptive.
The Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission (ACCC) has already taken enforcement action in
relation to several “green claims” that use words or phrases like
‘environmentally friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’ and ‘low emissions’ and
has released guidelines in a publication, Green Marketing and the Trade
Practices Act, which is available from the ACCC website.
Similar principles will apply in relation to the promotion of ‘green’ financial products and the ASIC Act.
There will also, of course, be challenges.
We are all carbon emitters. We need to learn to think in a world where, for the first time, carbon production comes at a cost.
Large carbon emitters will have to buy credits from those that produce less.
The
regime will bring another layer of reporting. Most immediately,
commercial property owners will have reporting obligations under the
National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (Cth).
It
will impact on choices we make about the type and location of office
buildings we inhabit, the amount and source of the power we use,
whether we have carbon offset programs (eg, planting trees for which we
can claim carbon offset credits), our transport and that of our staff
to and from the office and so on.
Some of these decisions, such
as entering into a long-term lease of premises, we may be making now
without any thought about the future cost of carbon emissions
associated with the premises.
Last March, the Government announced that Australia would have a carbon emissions trading scheme in place by 2010.
While
there have been some recent rumblings about whether or not 2010 is
still realistic in light of the financial crisis, it is likely that
some type of carbon emissions trade scheme will be introduced within
the life of your next lease.
The challenges
Of course, the challenges are there for the designers and regulators of the schemes as well.
The success of the schemes will depend on establishing an environment that is attractive to lenders and equity seekers.
The
designers will set parameters, such as annual targets, that will
directly impact on the price and the predictability of the price of the
new property rights (whether they are RECs or carbon offsets).
These will be important factors to lenders and those looking to purchase equity when making their decisions.
Banks
will need to consider revaluing their mortgage books and fund managers
their property portfolios having regard to the impact of the carbon
emissions of the building or land. Commercial buildings have been
estimated to produce 8.8 per cent of Australia’s total greenhouse
emissions.
It is likely that these emissions will adversely
impact the value of these buildings and that buildings designed with
ecologically sustainable principles in mind will become relatively more
valuable.
The relative cost of things will change depending
upon the level of carbon emissions produced in the chain of production.
The relative pre-carbon costs of steel, glass and aluminium will change
once the cost of carbon emissions is introduced.
The total of
the energy that goes into producing something during every stage of the
process (‘the embodied energy’) will now be measured and impact on the
price of the particular item.
Production techniques that are
viable now may not be cost effective post-carbon trading. Conversely,
some techniques that are not viable now may become so post-carbon
trading.
While this brave new world may seem too radical to be real, it is real.
Europe
has already started moving down this road. Governments are working on
legislation and the establishment of regulators. Irrespective of what
you think about the science of climate change, regulatory change is
coming.
Although short-term responses to economic conditions
may (or may not) hold back the tide for a brief moment, the tide is
advancing inexorably. Don’t be washed away. There is good work to be
done and real money to be made. It is those who are informed,
innovative and just a bit ahead of the pack that will make it.
There
is money to be lost – and it is those who are not informed and who are
caught out that will lose it. And then there will be the majority of us
who just struggle on with another lot of compliance, doing what we have
to in order to survive. Where will you be?
We’ll endeavour to
keep you up-to-date as Australia’s response to climate change takes
shape and the regulatory requirements become clearer.
Grant Holley is a partner at Holley Nethercote Commercial Lawyers, www.holleynethercote.com.au.