Calls for Professional Standards Board heard

23 November 2009 | by Lucinda Beaman

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share
The Parliamentary Joint Committee led by Bernie Ripoll has recommended the corporate regulator commence immediate work on the creation of a professional standards board for financial advisers, with the possibility the terms ‘financial adviser’ and ‘financial planner’ be restricted to use only by members.

This represents a win for groups such as the Financial Planning Association which lobbied for higher professional standards within the financial advice industry through the accountability that comes with a mandated professional body.

The committee recommended that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission immediately begin consultation with the financial services industry to establish an “independent, industry-based professional standards board”.

The board would oversee nomenclature, competency and conduct standards for financial advisers, the report states.

“This entity would share responsibility with ASIC for establishing, monitoring and enforcing competency and conduct standards for financial advisers,” the Ripoll report states.

“Such an arrangement could also enable the use of terms such as 'financial adviser' and 'financial planner' to be restricted to those qualifying as members and prepared to comply with the conditions imposed by the [Professional Standards Board].”

The FPA had recommended financial planners be defined in legislation and subject to higher standards through professional oversight, including having obligations attached to them through membership of a professional body.

The Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group and the Australasian Compliance Institute also proposed advisers be supervised by a professional body, or bodies, approved by ASIC, while fund managers including AXA and ING Australia also lobbied for such a body.

Treasury said while a professional standards body may have merit, its relationship with ASIC would need to be clearly defined.


Tags: asic | Australasian Compliance Institute | Australian Securities and Investments Commission | AXA Australia | Bernie Ripoll | BFPPG | Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group | Financial Planning Association | financial planning Professional Standards Board | FPA | ING Australia | Parliamentary Joint Committee inquiry into financial products and services | professional standards | Ripoll Inquiry | Treasury

Just in:


Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

1MM-AdviserPenalties Are penalties against advisers enforced by ASIC stringent enough and do they deter bad practice?
Yes, they are stringent enough and act as a deterrent against bad practice and unethical behaviour.
 
9%
Yes, but they are not enough of a deterrent.
 
5%
Yes, but there should be a register of those who have breached the law.
 
16%
No, they achieve nothing as recalcitrant advisers can simply set-up again after a few years.
 
70%
The poll is closed.

News Roundup

Sponsored links

The Blue Book Directory

Recent comments

Recent tweets