Remuneration scrutiny won't be contained to planners

16 March 2010 | by Mike Taylor

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share

Industry superannuation funds have acknowledged that the remuneration scrutiny directed at financial planners will ultimately shift to salaries paid to super fund executives.

Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) officer Andrew Barr has told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds that the scrutiny on remuneration may result in “the blowtorch being turned back on us”.

Explaining the AIST’s approach to the Cooper review, he said the likelihood of scrutiny being turned onto fund executive remuneration has resulted in a recommendation that funds make the information public. Barr said the AIST was recommending that member funds publish the remuneration of their top five executives in aggregate.

However, he said it would be open to funds to provide more details if they saw fit.

Barr said the AIST has also recommended that superannuation ratings houses make their commercial arrangements with funds more transparent.

He said that if a fund has paid to be rated, members should be made aware of the nature of the transaction.


Add a comment5 Comments

  1. Scott J | 18 March, 2010 at 06:24 PM
    Matt you simply made a statement that had no relevance to the article. Just as financial advisers should be remunerated for their advice an employee of an industry super fund can accept a salary. You obviously find the concept of fair remuneration a bit strange. Therefore I repeat, what is your point?
  2. jya. | 17 March, 2010 at 03:07 PM
    Is that right? My unbiased industry fund adviser who offered me the huge choice of 5 investment products has pocketed the commission on my insurance premium to help fund his union master....er I mean "super fund executive s" remuneration. Funny there was nothing on the FSG about this one. The TV tells me that my fund is run to profit me................................
  3. Matt | 17 March, 2010 at 01:38 PM
    It should be blindingly obvious Scotty, even way up there upon your high horse.
  4. Scott J | 17 March, 2010 at 06:47 AM
    And your point is Matt?
  5. Matt | 16 March, 2010 at 01:50 PM
    But but but industry funds are run solely for the profit of members??? Pfft.

Tags: AIST | Andrew Barr | Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees | CMSF | Conference of Major Superannuation Funds | industry superannuation funds | remuneration

Just in:


Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

News Roundup

Sponsored links

The Blue Book Directory

Recent comments

Recent tweets